India's largest platform and marketplace for AI & Analytics leaders & professionals

Sign in

India's largest platform and marketplace for AI & Analytics leaders & professionals

3AI Digital Library

Give AI a ‘positive’ spin: Google tells its scientists

3AI January 19, 2021

Google has reportedly been telling its scientists to give AI a “positive” spin in research papers.

Documents obtained by Reuters suggest that, in at least three cases, Google’s researchers were requested to refrain from being critical of AI technology.

A “sensitive topics” review was established by Google earlier this year to catch papers which cast a negative light on AI ahead of their publication.

Google asks its scientists to consult with legal, policy, and public relations teams prior to publishing anything on topics which could be deemed sensitive like sentiment analysis and categorisations of people based on race and/or political affiliation.

The new review means that papers from Google’s expert researchers which raise questions about AI developments may never be published. Reuters says four staff researchers believe Google is interfering with studies into potential technology harms.

Google recently faced scrutiny after firing leading AI ethics researcher Timnit Gebru.

Gebru is considered a pioneer in the field and researched the risks and inequalities found in large language models. She claims to have been fired by Google over an unpublished paper and sending an email critical of the company’s practices.

In an internal email countering Gebru’s claims, Head of Google Research Jeff Dean wrote:

“We’ve approved dozens of papers that Timnit and/or the other Googlers have authored and then published, but as you know, papers often require changes during the internal review process (or are even deemed unsuitable for submission). 

Unfortunately, this particular paper was only shared with a day’s notice before its deadline — we require two weeks for this sort of review — and then instead of awaiting reviewer feedback, it was approved for submission and submitted.

A cross-functional team then reviewed the paper as part of our regular process and the authors were informed that it didn’t meet our bar for publication and were given feedback about why.”

While it’s one word against another, it’s not a great look for Google.

“Advances in technology and the growing complexity of our external environment are increasingly leading to situations where seemingly inoffensive projects raise ethical, reputational, regulatory or legal issues,” Reuters reported one of Google’s documents as saying.

On its public-facing website, Google says that its scientists have “substantial” freedom—but that’s increasingly appearing like it’s not the case.

Picture from freepik.com

    3AI Trending Articles

  • Understanding Language Model Evaluation Metrics: A Comprehensive Overview

    Featured Article: Author: Mradul Jain, AB InBev Large language models, such as GPT, Llama, Bard, etc. have gained immense popularity for their ability to generate coherent and contextually relevant text. Evaluating the performance of these models is crucial to ensure their reliability and utility. To accomplish this, a range of metrics have been developed. In […]

  • Way to make object-recognition models perform better

    Adding a module that mimics part of the brain can prevent common errors made by computer vision models. Computer vision models known as convolutional neural networks can be trained to recognize objects nearly as accurately as humans do. However, these models have one significant flaw: Very small changes to an image, which would be nearly […]

  • Transforming Product Experience: How Generative AI is changing the game for Microsoft, Oracle, and AWS

    Featured Article: Author: Abhishek Tandon, Director, Customer Success for Fosfor, LTIMindtree Artificial Intelligence (AI) has revolutionized the way we interact with technology, and one of its most intriguing applications is conversational AI. Chatbots and virtual assistants have become increasingly popular, enabling businesses to provide personalized and efficient customer experiences. Companies like Microsoft, Oracle, and Amazon […]

  • How AI is transforming Financial Services

    Since its inception, AI has experienced at least two major hype cycles with resulting winters of disillusionment. Although after the first “winter”, many financial firms deployed a number of successful applications, by the 1990s, AI went into its second winter of disillusionment as realization set in that these systems were harder and more costly to build and maintain […]